Purpose Statement

American Education and Policy exist for the purpose of challenging the status quo, for improving the quality of instruction, training, or study, currently established for acquiring skills, enabling citizens to reason and make mature intellectual judgments needed for competing in the global economy; regardless of race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status.

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Prayer Rally for Education in America

Each year before school convenes, teachers seek to become reinvigorated through summer workshops, summer planning, and even summer vacation. I believe that this 2015-16 school year will prove as a crossroads in the educational systems of the United States of America. With the astounding civil rights actions that have recently become the law of the land, followed by the civil rights educational curriculum mandates being implemented in the state of Virginia; as eighth grade students will be learning about oral sex and anal sex, I am responding by calling for a prayer rally for all concerned. Matters of gender identity are also being forced on parents as the current trends in our society are going against the very foundation of what we have known as right in the eyes of God and society.

The torrent of the societal issues have confounded many, as changing the decisions of our supreme court are improbable. The new laws of the land have provided a portal for inclusion of what has been called civil rights into the educational curriculum for American children. For many, the proposed changes in school curriculum will create unrest and a need to continue to maintain perspective in one’s own homes. The educational truths regarding history of racism and slavery in America, matters regarding man and woman and gender identity as we have known, are being greatly altered and will leave the American society vulnerable and our children quite confused. For those offended by the funded civil rights curricula, school then becomes as a mandated cesspool for their children to attend each day. Their children must learn to receive training and mastery in matters that question their very existence.

I believe we are in a strategic crises and as we plead for God’s intervention, then we will see his mercy and his grace. We as educators are compelled to provide a well-rounded and rigorous curriculum for our students, but when faced with issues that offend or even challenge our own credence, then we know that this road ahead will not be easy. Therefore, I am calling all of you to pray for the education in America and to seek God each day regarding the many issues which are forthcoming this school year.

I am also laying aside August 29th as a day of prayer for education in America, and I invite you to join me. I would like us to rally at a designated place in Philadelphia to show our concerns for American education. Although many express acceptance of the new agenda for education, many also oppose the direction for education. Educators must be able to exist and fulfill our roles as our families must function in society in the midst of change, as the torrent of this age is moving in another direction. If you desire to join me for the prayer rally, please email me @Americaneducationandpolicy@gmail.com. I will know how I should plan based on your response.

Sincerely!!
Leah Spencer Hopkins


Monday, June 29, 2015

Racial Privilege or Social Justice

     



As the momentum regarding human rights is currently strong in America, and much is being shaken by intolerance and bigotry, the symbolism of the confederate flag remains a heated discussion. In the midst of radical changes in laws, the very framework of the American society is being recreated under the first African American President of the United States.  The policies of President Barack Obama will undoubtedly change American history. Because of racism, and class-ism, inequitable policies have permeated and dominated American society. However, on the strength of recent changes for human rights in America, I wish to advocate for equitable education for all Americans. Barriers of social justice obviously extend beyond one’s social-economic status, and race; as education is undoubtedly the great divider among many Americans as many poorer districts and schools function on low budgets and limited funding while proving the absence of social justice.

The responsibility of funding American schools are largely in the hands of the states; however, the federal government also provides assistance to the states. The ESEA act authorizes grants for children in low-income families, for instructional materials and library resources. Tax payer's investment in education is a significant part of K-12 school funding and the contribution is said to even exceed the monies for national defense. But 83 cents of every dollar is said to come from the state and the local levels. The federal government’s share is 8.3 percent. K-12 are funded by federal government through NCLB, Title 1, ELA, Reading First, Improving teacher Quality Grants, and other NCLB grants which support charter schools, strengthen high schools, & support the after-school learning programs for American Indians, Alaska Natives, and migrant students (U.S.ed.gov). 

Social justice has remained a problem in America, from matters of the civil rights act of 1964, rights for voting in 1965, housing laws of 1968, and the Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education of 1969; which ended the racially segregated schools systems of the south (Hanks, 2009). Although the blatant racist practices previously existed toward African Americans, the present day has had challenges of white privilege, more abstract treatments, and institutionalized practices, as these had to be proven over time and are now being exposed. According to Lawrence, 2009, institutionalized racism refers to practices or patterns seemingly neutral but having a different kind of negativity for opportunities toward people with color. During this present era, hundreds of whites are acknowledging their white privilege, as many are also contesting and protesting against the injustices and treatment of blacks who have endured unjust arrests and abuses simply because of their race. The U.S Census shows that 19 million black men under 35 years of age exist in the U.S.. The ratio of black males in prison is approximately 10 percent. People of color make up 30 percent of the population in the United states but make up 60 percent of the imprisoned. Comparisons are outlandish as while 1 of 15 imprisoned are African American men, 1 of 36 are Hispanic men, and 1 of 106 are white men (Kerby, 2012).

As the institutionalized racism is uncovered and despised by many, one cannot ignore the cities of the U.S., as they are dominated by minorities. Consequently, school districts in the cities have suffered, as policies and reforms have not been able to penetrate the walls of racism. One cannot assume that the failing schools are simply because the students are inferior to their suburban counterparts. As, the right to have fully funded schools regardless of one’s race and socio-economic status remains a major problem in many cities of the U.S.  Even the School District Philadelphia still has a significant shortfall, as school funding has suffered due to the cuts in public educational funding of 1 billion dollars. Because Philadelphia is now run by a School Reform Commission (SRC) who were appointed by Governor Corbett, the concept of public education , where community level decisions occur under a locally elected school board, or the direct participation of citizens (Resnick, 2006) is no longer a reality for Philadelphia.

The issues of social justice and racial privilege are finally being acknowledged and we can be hopeful that the United States will live up to its great name as change is occurring. People are beginning to recognize and fight against matters of racial profiling and social injustices. As we are one people and one nation, when one group suffers while another flourishes only because of racial privilege, then the people lose. A nation must recognize that our differences provide benefits of interdependence among multi-cultures and races within society. Racial privilege or social justice? I vote for social justice.


      References

Lawrence, H. J. (2009). The Obama presidency and the question of social justice: a critical analysis of the meaningful milestone. Forum on Public Policy Online. 1(16)


Spelling, M. (2005). 10 facts about K-12 funding. U.S. Department of Education. http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/10facts/index.html?e

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Age to Begin Lessons in Music




Beginning a young child on piano lessons may not result in her playing a Rachmaninov piano concerto; however, one cannot diminish the benefits of early childhood music education. Surrounding young children with musical activities through processes of exploration, play, and interaction, fosters use of all parts of the brain. Claire Doodle Clark says that though some have believed music processes to take place in the right hemisphere of the brain, and that processes that take place in the left side of the brain include mathematics, and language, Levitin has proven otherwise. In Daniel Levitin's "This is Your Brain on Music: The Science of Human Obsession," he explores how studies prove music has distribution throughout the brain. Examples of those with brain damage, as in an inability to read the newspaper are found with the ability to still read music as music composition, listening, and performance engage all areas of the brain. According to Claire Dooley Clark, when young children take lessons, they develop gross, fine motor skills, cognitive skills, emotional and social interaction, language, self esteem, creativity and imagination, problem-solving, listening skills, coordination, and memory development.

These music education findings are presented to encourage parents to keep doing what they do with their young children; keep the lessons coming and know that lessons are not in vain.


Friday, April 24, 2015

Unbalanced Educational Practices in America

Many believe that high-stakes testing are for providing teachers with a clearer picture of student weaknesses, and to allow for educators to target failing schools, while encouraging students to work harder. On the other hand, critics believe that the tests promote a narrowing of the curriculum, and promote increased pressure on teachers and students (Blazer, 2011). While either belief has varying truth, an alarming problem still exist; regardless of a school’s resources, or inequitable differences, each school is held to the same standards; low income and high income are evaluated alike. Undoubtedly, standardized tests have had disproportionate effects on low income communities (Blazer, 2011). The disparities of teachers and administrators in some districts have triggered cheating scandals across America on high-stakes testing. Sadly, the cheating has recently been among minority districts; although, cheating has occurred across the United States of America; including Washington DC, Texas, Alabama, Chicago, and New York City (Beckett).

As of 2014, eight teachers of the School District of Philadelphia have been charged with cheating on standardized tests.  A principal and teachers were punished for impropriety. This year the most recent scandal in Atlanta has escalated to teachers being sent to prison for cheating on high stakes testing. The conspiracy to inflate scores was called “the sickest things that’s ever happened in Atlanta” by the judge. Three educators were sentenced to seven years in prison and the others were also given time as they were said to have changed scores on standardized tests.  The judge believed that the students were harmed through the process. Las Vegas Nevada also had a recent cheating scandal as three teachers of the Clark County School District are now on leave during the investigation of the matter. Why have these educators been driven to such disparities as to risk the loss of their own freedoms? All educators administering the standardized tests are trained and warned of the gravity of their role and of the security measures that are in place for reliable test scores. However, I believe that a corrupt system of assessment and education has enlisted some of the best educators to risk their own futures; not to promote cheating but rather understanding of the inequities in education in America.

Consider how students in low income areas start out with high intelligence like their suburban counter-parts, but the paths of learning and experiences that are taken along the way, which correspond to the income status of the student, unfortunately broaden the variances of knowledge. As students attend school, the learning experiences differ greatly as funding in the affluent communities is drastically different from those in low income communities.  Even qualification of teachers differ; regarding credentials, background on a subject, test scores, pedagogical training, or experience. Teachers who are less qualified often teach in minority and low income schools (Lankford, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2002; Socias, Chambers, Esra & Shambaugh, 2007). Students of color are more likely to have teachers who teach outside their area of preparation than students in affluent and predominantly white schools (Darling-Hammond, 2010).Teacher qualification is important for student achievement as studies have shown that teacher credentials and preparation greatly affect the gains of the students (Boydd, Grossman , Lankford, Loeb & Wyckoff, 2006).

As charter schools are being promoted in urban communities, many states do not require that teachers in charter school have certification as only 75 percent of teachers in K-5 must be certified, and only 50 percent in grades six through twelve must have certification(Carrunthers, 2009). Charter schools are meant to provide choice for children’s education, and instructional innovation while targeting the underserved student. Charter schools are said to seek out the best teachers and are able to raise funds from individuals, foundations, and corporations, to pay teachers as they can pay higher teacher salaries (Manuel, 2007). However, many charters school pay less than traditional public schools and they are not required to offer tenure or participate in state plans for retirement for teachers (Carrunthers, 2009).


  Certification of teachers is of utmost importance as while one may possess a skill or ability to perform, one may not possess knowledge as to how to differentiate instruction for various learning styles among children as a certified teacher. While one may conclude that having a teacher in place is better than no teacher, one must consider the suburban counter-part where only the best teachers for their children are accepted. Succeeding on high-stakes testing will require high-quality teachers to help students to gain the opportunities that high-stakes testing affords them. Although many protest against high-stakes testing, and are opting out of high-stakes testing, the tests remain lawful practices and are still used to make decisions regarding the lives of American students. 

                                                                            References
Adamson, F., Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Funding disparities and Inequitable distribution of teachers:evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Achives. 20(37).  
  
Beckett, L. (2013). America’s most outrageous teaching scandals.ProPublica. http://www.propublica.org/article/americas-most-outrageous-teacher-cheating-scandals.
Blazer, C. (2011). Unintended consequences of high stakes testing. Information Capsule. 1008(22).

Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Rockoff, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2008, June). The narrowing gap in NewYork City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in highpoverty schools (National Bureau of Economic Research: Working Paper 14021). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Carrunthers, C. (2009). The qualifications and classroom performance of teachers moving to charter schools. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in American Research. 27

Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.

Manuel, J. (2007): “Charter Schools Revisited: A Decade After Authorization, How Goes the North Carolina Experience?” North Carolina Insight, 22.


Thursday, February 26, 2015

Cooperative Learning versus Competition



Over the years, I have become an advocate, believing that all children can learn. For some students, support needed may be attributed to a physical disability, sight disability, behavioral disability, or even a learning disability perhaps due to neurological issues, but I see the students are often genius in their own way. I appreciate the uniqueness of each learner but unfortunately have noticed that the students who have different learning styles are isolated even in a classroom practicing inclusion.

 Cooperative learning has not been learned by many regular education students but is a viable solution for learning. Learning support students have often displayed the sensitivity and support of cooperative learning for one another, as this same support should be seen in all classrooms practicing inclusion. The classroom structure and interaction occurring with student-centered learning has much to do with how well students learn, how they feel about school and themselves. Interacting may include students interacting through competition; individually, or even cooperating while taking interest in one another’s learning. (Johnson & Johnson, 1988).  Unfortunately, competition is most prevalent in the United States as is seen through; a) the way students are honored and receive awards; b) the way teachers entrust students with roles and responsibilities; c) through achievements and other extra-curricular courses.  Since educators are responsible to educate each child, competition should be lessened as some students may do their best but because they learn differently, may not achieve what another child achieves in math or reading. Another child may succeed in the arts or sciences.

Cooperative learning involves grouping students together helping one another to learn academic content (Slavin, 2014). Students working together, and toward the same end is ideal but must begin as early as possible. Recently, I had the opportunity of viewing a documentary video that told of the experiences of American students who suffered with dyslexia which is a reader disorder.  The disorder is a neurological disorder in origin and affects student’s ability to accurately or fluently recognize words. Issues related to dyslexia also may include problems with reading comprehension while reducing reading which impedes growth (Tennessee, 2013- 2014). The video affected me strongly as I have personally observed how American students who are considered mainstream students view themselves as superior to students who are labeled “learning support” students.  The documentary showed how dyslexic students often excel in areas of their life in extraordinary ways.
While legislature from the state of Pennsylvania identifies dyslexia as a neurological disorder with unexpected difficulties with fluency and word recognition and poor decoding or spelling abilities as this is not connected to an individual’s intellect (Pennsylvania, 2013-2014). The state has embarked on a pilot program in three districts for feasibility of early screening and intervention.
   
In a society where competition is engrained into the culture, students must learn that they can cooperate with learning for each student no matter the learning style.. They can learn to be caring and helpful citizens.  The presumptions that students have about one another can be clarified if they are taught to work together early on in their classroom experiences. More positive and productive ways of thinking can be learned related to varying learning styles compared to the way they individually learn.


Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Valuing Music Education



               
Having served as a music educator in the School District of Philadelphia since 1987, I recognize that one must not diminish the value of music education in the lives of students.  Empirical evidence of how music education has the power to transform a sad and hopeless child into one of renewed and hopeful energy in just a 45 minute session per week is extraordinary. The singing of folk songs, art songs, and songs that students can grasp and become engaged in with a music educator, should never be removed from a child’s educational experience. Learning theory, arts literacy and other important musical elements are an integral part of music education. Student anticipation of performances is priceless. The reinforcements that students who are considered mediocre and special needs students receive from music education and arts education are incomparable to any other experience. Many students have great success as I have witnessed my autistic students who are quite strong in music education. I have witnessed some of my best singers, and those with the ability to match pitch accurately to be students with learning support.  Success makes success and as the students experience music education in the general vocal music classroom, the music learning also supports other kinds of learning in their home classrooms.

Presently, I am engaged with my students in a unit on rhythm. Interdisciplinary kinds of learning are easily taught through the arts and music education as are being done through this unit. As the students learned the duration of various kinds of notes, their assignment was to “do the math” to total the rhythmic counts for a series of combined notes. I help students to see that learning music requires understanding of math and science and much more. When I discuss pitch accuracy and intonation, they learn of singing in tune and singing flat and sharp. This is important for understanding the speed of pitch and for tuning instruments. My classroom has a “music word wall” and for every unit of study, I include relevant vocabulary. Music vocabulary learning increases literacy.

Unfortunately, resources for the arts are not readily available in many schools, but this is obviously to a fault. The general vocal music teacher has the ability to transform a school if she has an effective program. All grade levels can develop musical skills as numerous studies show that music education will increase student learning and improve test scores. The irony is that in an effort to increase test scores, some schools opt out of the arts which is contrary to all that is true about the effects of arts in education.  I often see students who remind me that they have music class on a particular day as they are planning on coming to school on that day, in anticipation of participating in general vocal music. This is another benefit of the arts in a school. Student attendance improves.  

Giving respect where respect is due is necessary for deserving arts teachers. Being called a “prep class” is demeaning to those who seek to live up to the title of an arts specialist. Unfortunately, many arts teachers are still called “prep teachers” and are not given the respect for the value they bring to a school.  Without music and the arts, a curriculum can be sterile and unappetizing for many students. The realization of the value of music should be taught and embedded in the curriculum of a school if the benefits will be embraced and welcomed by those who have not yet understood its value.

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Building Community in the Classroom is Essential for 21st Century Education




Students working together with one another in the same classroom must not be taken for granted as the skill must be developed. Even the process of assigning new seating and planning team assignments can create conflict. Because many classroom activities are designed for student engagement, students often have opinions about who they sit next to.  Being adamant about sitting next to a particular classmate may become quite common if community has not been developed. Students are quick to express that they do not get along with certain students and therefore, a teacher should not ignore student requests; however, the teacher can seek to remedy the problem. Solving student relationship problems must be a school-wide endeavor or once students leave one class, they will take a different behavior to the next class. Principals and climate workers must work together to build community among students and teachers.

As students are raised in diverse contexts, how conflicts among relationships within the home are resolved will certainly affect the way a child responds to his classmates when conflict arises. Children learn what they see. Relationship deficiencies become apparent when conflict occurs among peers and peaceful resolutions are not practiced. While disagreements should not lead to an argument, unfortunately, the only response to a disagreement may result in a dispute or strife because strife is most familiar to a particular student. If one will build community inside a classroom, one will need to proactively lead to build relationships (Burke, 2011).

Building community is an integral part of instruction as although the common core standards do not specify how they should be taught, as they rather provide grade level goals; however, they represent a synthesis of components of the best student work from across countries and states (Common Core Standards Initiative, 2014).  Good learning demands that instruction be differentiated to accommodate all students, student-centered, and that students remain engaged in learning, as they collaborate with peers, and community. The challenge arises when students do not possess the interpersonal skills, community, and team-building skills to achieve classroom goals.


While most administrators hold teachers responsible for academic rigor, measurable results from student testing, and building strong networks among stakeholders; administrators must realize that they play an integral part in student outcomes. To avoid blaming and tensions among administrators and teachers, a revolutionary idea with three components include community building, contextualized learning, and selecting a capstone project is recommended particularly for the CTE classroom (Burke, 2011). Although this model is originally developed for a 21st century CTE with Common Core Standards in Math, I believe that the ideas are replaceable for other subjects. The teambuilding needed for completing projects is said to help improve relationships, to lessen disciplinary problems, heighten student engaging, and to increase student attendance (Burke, 2011).