Purpose Statement
American Education and Policy exist for the purpose of challenging the status quo, for improving the quality of instruction, training, or study, currently established for acquiring skills, enabling citizens to reason and make mature intellectual judgments needed for competing in the global economy; regardless of race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status.
Saturday, August 8, 2015
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
Prayer Rally for Education in America
Each year before school convenes, teachers seek
to become reinvigorated through summer workshops, summer planning, and even summer
vacation. I believe that this 2015-16 school year will prove as a crossroads in
the educational systems of the United States of America. With the astounding
civil rights actions that have recently become the law of the land, followed by the civil
rights educational curriculum mandates being implemented in the state of
Virginia; as eighth grade students will be learning about oral sex and anal sex,
I am responding by calling for a prayer rally for all concerned. Matters of gender identity
are also being forced on parents as the current trends in our society are going
against the very foundation of what we have known as right in the eyes of God
and society.
The torrent of the societal issues have confounded many, as changing the decisions of our supreme court are improbable. The new
laws of the land have provided a portal for inclusion of what has been called
civil rights into the educational curriculum for American children. For many,
the proposed changes in school curriculum will create unrest and a need to
continue to maintain perspective in one’s own homes. The educational truths regarding
history of racism and slavery in America, matters regarding man and woman and
gender identity as we have known, are being greatly altered and will leave the
American society vulnerable and our children quite confused. For those offended
by the funded civil rights curricula, school then becomes as a mandated
cesspool for their children to attend each day. Their children must learn to receive
training and mastery in matters that question their very existence.
I believe we are in a strategic crises and as we plead
for God’s intervention, then we will see his mercy and his grace. We as educators are compelled
to provide a well-rounded and rigorous curriculum for our students, but when
faced with issues that offend or even challenge our own credence, then we know that
this road ahead will not be easy. Therefore, I am calling all of you to pray
for the education in America and to seek God each day regarding the many issues
which are forthcoming this school year.
I am also laying aside August 29th as a day of prayer for
education in America, and I invite you to join me. I would like us to rally at
a designated place in Philadelphia to show our concerns for American education.
Although many express acceptance of the new agenda for education, many also oppose
the direction for education. Educators must be able to exist and fulfill our
roles as our families must function in society in the midst of change, as the torrent of
this age is moving in another direction. If you desire to join me for the
prayer rally, please email me @Americaneducationandpolicy@gmail.com. I will
know how I should plan based on your response.
Sincerely!!
Leah Spencer Hopkins
Monday, June 29, 2015
Racial Privilege or Social Justice
As the momentum regarding
human rights is currently strong in America, and much is being shaken by
intolerance and bigotry, the symbolism of the confederate flag remains a heated
discussion. In the midst of radical changes in laws, the very framework of the
American society is being recreated under the first African American President
of the United States. The policies of President Barack Obama will undoubtedly change American history. Because of racism, and
class-ism, inequitable policies have permeated and dominated American
society. However, on the strength of recent changes for human rights in
America, I wish to advocate for equitable education for all Americans. Barriers of social justice obviously extend beyond one’s social-economic status, and
race; as education is undoubtedly the great divider among many Americans as many poorer districts and schools function on low budgets and limited funding while proving the absence of social justice.
The responsibility of funding
American schools are largely in the hands of the states; however, the federal
government also provides assistance to the states. The ESEA act authorizes
grants for children in low-income families, for instructional materials and
library resources. Tax payer's investment in education is a significant part of
K-12 school funding and the contribution is said to even exceed the monies for national defense.
But 83 cents of every dollar is said to come from the state and the local
levels. The federal government’s share is 8.3 percent. K-12 are funded by
federal government through NCLB, Title 1, ELA, Reading First, Improving teacher
Quality Grants, and other NCLB grants which support charter schools, strengthen
high schools, & support the after-school learning programs for American
Indians, Alaska Natives, and migrant students (U.S.ed.gov).
Social justice has remained a
problem in America, from matters of the civil rights act of 1964, rights
for voting in 1965, housing laws of 1968, and the Alexander v. Holmes County Board
of Education of 1969; which ended the racially segregated schools systems of
the south (Hanks, 2009). Although the blatant racist practices previously existed toward African
Americans, the present day has had challenges of white privilege, more abstract
treatments, and institutionalized practices, as these had to be proven over time and are now being exposed. According to Lawrence, 2009, institutionalized racism refers to
practices or patterns seemingly neutral but having a different kind of
negativity for opportunities toward people with color. During this present era, hundreds of whites are acknowledging their white privilege, as many are also
contesting and protesting against the injustices and treatment of blacks who have endured unjust arrests and abuses simply because of their race. The U.S Census shows that 19 million black
men under 35 years of age exist in the U.S.. The ratio of black males in prison is
approximately 10 percent. People of color make up 30 percent of the population
in the United states but make up 60 percent of the imprisoned. Comparisons are
outlandish as while 1 of 15 imprisoned are African American men, 1 of 36 are Hispanic
men, and 1 of 106 are white men (Kerby, 2012).
As the institutionalized
racism is uncovered and despised by many, one cannot ignore the cities of the
U.S., as they are dominated by minorities. Consequently, school districts in the
cities have suffered, as policies and reforms have not been able to penetrate
the walls of racism. One cannot assume that the failing schools are simply
because the students are inferior to their suburban counterparts. As, the right
to have fully funded schools regardless of one’s race and socio-economic status
remains a major problem in many cities of the U.S. Even the School District Philadelphia still
has a significant shortfall, as school funding has suffered due to the cuts in public educational funding of 1
billion dollars. Because Philadelphia is now run by
a School Reform Commission (SRC) who were appointed by Governor Corbett, the
concept of public education , where community level decisions occur under a
locally elected school board, or the direct participation of citizens
(Resnick, 2006) is no longer a reality for Philadelphia.
The issues of social justice
and racial privilege are finally being acknowledged and we can be hopeful that the United States will live up to its great name as change is
occurring. People are beginning to recognize and fight against matters of racial profiling and social injustices. As we are one people and one nation, when one
group suffers while another flourishes only because of racial privilege, then the people lose. A nation must recognize that our differences provide benefits of interdependence
among multi-cultures and races within society. Racial privilege or social
justice? I vote for social justice.
References
Lawrence, H. J. (2009). The Obama
presidency and the question of social justice: a critical analysis of the
meaningful milestone. Forum on Public Policy Online. 1(16)
Resnick, M. (2006). Center for Public
Education (CPE). http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Public-education/An-American-imperative-Public-education-
Tuesday, June 2, 2015
Age to Begin Lessons in Music
Beginning a young child on piano lessons may not result in her playing a Rachmaninov piano concerto; however, one cannot diminish the benefits of early childhood music education. Surrounding young children with musical activities through processes of exploration, play, and interaction, fosters use of all parts of the brain. Claire Doodle Clark says that though some have believed music processes to take place in the right hemisphere of the brain, and that processes that take place in the left side of the brain include mathematics, and language, Levitin has proven otherwise. In Daniel Levitin's "This is Your Brain on Music: The Science of Human Obsession," he explores how studies prove music has distribution throughout the brain. Examples of those with brain damage, as in an inability to read the newspaper are found with the ability to still read music as music composition, listening, and performance engage all areas of the brain. According to Claire Dooley Clark, when young children take lessons, they develop gross, fine motor skills, cognitive skills, emotional and social interaction, language, self esteem, creativity and imagination, problem-solving, listening skills, coordination, and memory development.
These music education findings are presented to encourage parents to keep doing what they do with their young children; keep the lessons coming and know that lessons are not in vain.
Friday, April 24, 2015
Unbalanced Educational Practices in America
Many believe that high-stakes testing are for
providing teachers with a clearer picture of student weaknesses, and to allow
for educators to target failing schools, while encouraging students to work
harder. On the other hand, critics believe that the tests promote a narrowing
of the curriculum, and promote increased pressure on teachers and students (Blazer,
2011). While either belief has varying truth, an alarming problem still exist; regardless
of a school’s resources, or inequitable differences, each school is held to the
same standards; low income and high income are evaluated alike. Undoubtedly, standardized
tests have had disproportionate effects on low income communities (Blazer,
2011). The disparities of teachers and administrators in some districts have
triggered cheating scandals across America on high-stakes testing. Sadly, the cheating
has recently been among minority districts; although, cheating has occurred across
the United States of America; including Washington DC, Texas, Alabama, Chicago,
and New York City (Beckett).
As of 2014, eight teachers of the School District of
Philadelphia have been charged with cheating on standardized tests. A principal and teachers were punished for impropriety.
This year the most recent scandal in Atlanta has escalated to teachers being
sent to prison for cheating on high stakes testing. The conspiracy to inflate
scores was called “the sickest things that’s ever happened in Atlanta” by the
judge. Three educators were sentenced to seven years in prison and the others
were also given time as they were said to have changed scores on standardized
tests. The judge believed that the
students were harmed through the process. Las Vegas Nevada also had a recent
cheating scandal as three teachers of the Clark County School District are now
on leave during the investigation of the matter. Why have these educators been
driven to such disparities as to risk the loss of their own freedoms? All
educators administering the standardized tests are trained and warned of the
gravity of their role and of the security measures that are in place for
reliable test scores. However, I believe that a corrupt system of assessment
and education has enlisted some of the best educators to risk their own
futures; not to promote cheating but rather understanding of the inequities in education in America.
Consider how students in low income areas start out
with high intelligence like their suburban counter-parts, but the paths of
learning and experiences that are taken along the way, which correspond to the
income status of the student, unfortunately broaden the variances of knowledge.
As students attend school, the learning experiences differ greatly as funding
in the affluent communities is drastically different from those in low income
communities. Even qualification of
teachers differ; regarding credentials, background on a subject, test scores,
pedagogical training, or experience. Teachers who are less qualified often
teach in minority and low income schools (Lankford, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2002;
Socias, Chambers, Esra & Shambaugh, 2007). Students of color are more
likely to have teachers who teach outside their area of preparation than
students in affluent and predominantly white schools (Darling-Hammond, 2010).Teacher
qualification is important for student achievement as studies have shown that
teacher credentials and preparation greatly affect the gains of the students (Boydd,
Grossman , Lankford, Loeb & Wyckoff, 2006).
As charter schools are being promoted in urban
communities, many states do not require that teachers in charter school have certification
as only 75 percent of teachers in K-5 must be certified, and only 50 percent in
grades six through twelve must have certification(Carrunthers, 2009). Charter
schools are meant to provide choice for children’s education, and instructional
innovation while targeting the underserved student. Charter schools are said to
seek out the best teachers and are able to raise funds from individuals,
foundations, and corporations, to pay teachers as they can pay higher teacher
salaries (Manuel, 2007). However, many charters school pay less than traditional public
schools and they are not required to offer tenure or participate in state plans
for retirement for teachers (Carrunthers, 2009).
Certification of teachers is of utmost importance as while
one may possess a skill or ability to perform, one may not possess knowledge as
to how to differentiate instruction for various learning styles among children as a certified teacher.
While one may conclude that having a teacher in place is better than no
teacher, one must consider the suburban counter-part where only the best teachers
for their children are accepted. Succeeding on high-stakes testing will require
high-quality teachers to help students to gain the opportunities that
high-stakes testing affords them. Although many protest against high-stakes
testing, and are opting out of high-stakes testing, the tests remain lawful
practices and are still used to make decisions regarding the lives of American
students.
References
Adamson, F., Darling-Hammond, L. (2012).
Funding disparities and Inequitable distribution
of teachers:evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis
Achives. 20(37).
Beckett, L. (2013). America’s most outrageous teaching scandals.ProPublica. http://www.propublica.org/article/americas-most-outrageous-teacher-cheating-scandals.
Blazer, C. (2011). Unintended
consequences of high stakes testing. Information Capsule. 1008(22).
Boyd, D.,
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Rockoff, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2008, June). The
narrowing gap in NewYork City teacher qualifications and its implications for
student achievement in highpoverty schools (National Bureau of Economic
Research: Working Paper 14021). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of
Economic Research.
Carrunthers, C.
(2009). The qualifications and classroom
performance of teachers moving to charter schools. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in
American Research. 27
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff,
J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive
analysis. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
Manuel, J. (2007): “Charter Schools
Revisited: A Decade After Authorization, How Goes the North Carolina
Experience?” North Carolina Insight, 22.
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Cooperative Learning versus Competition
Over the years, I have become an advocate, believing that
all children can learn. For some students, support needed may be attributed to
a physical disability, sight disability, behavioral disability, or even a
learning disability perhaps due to neurological issues, but I see the students are
often genius in their own way. I appreciate the uniqueness of each learner but unfortunately
have noticed that the students who have different learning styles are isolated
even in a classroom practicing inclusion.
Cooperative learning
has not been learned by many regular education students but is a viable solution for learning. Learning support
students have often displayed the sensitivity and support of cooperative
learning for one another, as this same support should be seen in all classrooms
practicing inclusion. The classroom structure and interaction occurring with student-centered
learning has much to do with how well students learn, how they feel about school
and themselves. Interacting may include students interacting through competition; individually, or
even cooperating while taking interest in one another’s learning. (Johnson &
Johnson, 1988). Unfortunately, competition is most
prevalent in the United States as is seen through; a) the way students are honored
and receive awards; b) the way teachers entrust students with roles and
responsibilities; c) through achievements and other extra-curricular courses. Since educators are responsible to educate
each child, competition should be lessened as some students may do their best but
because they learn differently, may not achieve what another child achieves in
math or reading. Another child may succeed in the arts or sciences.
Cooperative learning involves grouping students together
helping one another to learn academic content (Slavin, 2014). Students working
together, and toward the same end is ideal but must begin as early as possible.
Recently, I had the opportunity of viewing a documentary video that told of the
experiences of American students who suffered with dyslexia which is a reader
disorder. The disorder is a neurological
disorder in origin and affects student’s ability to accurately or fluently
recognize words. Issues related to dyslexia also may include problems with reading
comprehension while reducing reading which impedes growth (Tennessee, 2013-
2014). The video affected me strongly as I have personally observed how
American students who are considered mainstream students view themselves as
superior to students who are labeled “learning support” students. The documentary showed how dyslexic students
often excel in areas of their life in extraordinary ways.
While legislature from the state of Pennsylvania identifies
dyslexia as a neurological disorder with unexpected difficulties with fluency
and word recognition and poor decoding or spelling abilities as this is not
connected to an individual’s intellect (Pennsylvania, 2013-2014). The state has
embarked on a pilot program in three districts for feasibility of early screening
and intervention.
In a society where competition is engrained into the
culture, students must learn that they can cooperate with learning for each
student no matter the learning style.. They can learn to be
caring and helpful citizens. The
presumptions that students have about one another can be clarified if they are
taught to work together early on in their classroom experiences. More positive
and productive ways of thinking can be learned related to varying learning
styles compared to the way they individually learn.
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Valuing Music Education
Having served as a music educator in the School District of
Philadelphia since 1987, I recognize that one must not diminish the value of
music education in the lives of students.
Empirical evidence of how music education has the power to transform a
sad and hopeless child into one of renewed and hopeful energy in just a 45
minute session per week is extraordinary. The singing of folk songs, art songs,
and songs that students can grasp and become engaged in with a music educator, should
never be removed from a child’s educational experience. Learning theory, arts
literacy and other important musical
elements are an integral part of music education. Student anticipation of
performances is priceless. The reinforcements that students who are considered
mediocre and special needs students receive from music education and arts
education are incomparable to any other experience. Many students have great
success as I have witnessed my autistic students who are quite strong in music
education. I have witnessed some of my best singers, and those with the ability
to match pitch accurately to be students with learning support. Success makes success and as the students
experience music education in the general vocal music classroom, the music learning
also supports other kinds of learning in their home classrooms.
Presently, I am engaged with my students in a unit on
rhythm. Interdisciplinary kinds of learning are easily taught through the arts
and music education as are being done through this unit. As the students learned
the duration of various kinds of notes, their assignment was to “do the math”
to total the rhythmic counts for a series of combined notes. I help students to
see that learning music requires understanding of math and science and much
more. When I discuss pitch accuracy and intonation, they learn of singing in
tune and singing flat and sharp. This is important for understanding the speed
of pitch and for tuning instruments. My classroom has a “music word wall” and
for every unit of study, I include relevant vocabulary. Music vocabulary learning
increases literacy.
Unfortunately, resources for the arts are not readily
available in many schools, but this is obviously to a fault. The general vocal
music teacher has the ability to transform a school if she has an effective
program. All grade levels can develop musical skills as numerous studies show
that music education will increase student learning and improve test scores.
The irony is that in an effort to increase test scores, some schools opt out of
the arts which is contrary to all that is true about the
effects of arts in education. I often see
students who remind me that they have music class on a particular day as
they are planning on coming to school on that day, in anticipation of
participating in general vocal music. This is another benefit of the arts in a school. Student attendance improves.
Giving respect where respect is due is necessary for
deserving arts teachers. Being called a “prep class” is demeaning to those who
seek to live up to the title of an arts specialist. Unfortunately, many arts teachers
are still called “prep teachers” and are not given the respect for the value
they bring to a school. Without music
and the arts, a curriculum can be sterile and unappetizing for many students. The realization of the value of music should be taught and embedded in the curriculum
of a school if the benefits will be embraced and welcomed by those who have not
yet understood its value.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)